Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Released July 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the XG-1 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XG-1 was introduced 2 years later than the GR Digital IV and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the XG-1 scores vs the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax XG-1 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are available at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
XG-1 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2014 | September 2011 | More recent by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Pentax XG-1
GR Digital IV | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
XG-1 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Pentax XG-1 has external measurements of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the XG-1 against the GR Digital IV.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XG-1 and GR Digital IV is 66 and 92 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XG-1 and GR Digital IV.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XG-1 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Pentax XG-1 will deliver greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern XG-1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Pentax XG-1 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax XG-1 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-07-15 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | 390 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LB-060 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $599 | $599 |