Pentax XG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4

Here is a in depth overview of the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XG-1 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is very close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XG-1 was unveiled 6 months later than the WG-4 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the XG-1 grades against the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax XG-1 & Ricoh WG-4. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Pentax XG-1 comes with outside dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Analyze the Pentax XG-1 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the XG-1 versus the WG-4.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XG-1 and WG-4 is 66 and 90 respectively.

Normally, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XG-1 and WG-4.

As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you can expect comparable quality of files although you need to take the launch date of the cameras into account.