Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Introduced July 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the XG-1 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XG-1 was unveiled 4 years later than the PL200 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the XG-1 grades against the PL200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax XG-1 & Samsung PL200. The full galleries are available at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung PL200
| XG-1 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2014 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Pentax XG-1
| PL200 | XG-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung PL200
| XG-1 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Pentax XG-1 features outside dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the XG-1 compared to the PL200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XG-1 and PL200 is 66 and 94 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XG-1 and PL200.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Pentax XG-1 to provide greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger XG-1 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax XG-1 | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-07-15 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lbs) | 170 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LB-060 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $599 | $0 |