Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SH100
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
99 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Released July 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SH100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Samsung. The resolution of the XG-1 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XG-1 was revealed 3 years after the SH100 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XG-1 scores against the SH100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax XG-1 & Samsung SH100. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung SH100
| XG-1 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 43 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Pentax XG-1
| SH100 | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SH100
| XG-1 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Pentax XG-1 comes with physical dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung SH100 has dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SH100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XG-1 compared to the SH100.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XG-1 and SH100 is 66 and 99 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XG-1 and SH100.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Pentax XG-1 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent XG-1 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax XG-1 | Samsung SH100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-07-15 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LB-060 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $599 | $200 |