Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL102
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Pentax and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XG-1 was introduced 5 years after the SL102 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the XG-1 scores versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax XG-1 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung SL102
| XG-1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 68 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Pentax XG-1
| SL102 | XG-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SL102
| XG-1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Pentax XG-1 has outside dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the XG-1 versus the SL102.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XG-1 and SL102 is 66 and 96 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The image here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XG-1 and SL102.
All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Pentax XG-1 to offer extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent XG-1 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax XG-1 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-07-15 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LB-060 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $130 |