Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL202
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
Photography Glossary Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SL202, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XG-1 was manufactured 5 years after the SL202 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XG-1 matches up versus the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax XG-1 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung SL202
| XG-1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 66 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Pentax XG-1
| SL202 | XG-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SL202
| XG-1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Pentax XG-1 provides physical dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the XG-1 vs the SL202.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the XG-1 and SL202 is 66 and 94 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The image here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XG-1 and SL202.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Pentax XG-1 to result in extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer XG-1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax XG-1 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-07-15 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LB-060 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $599 | $140 |