Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung TL240
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung TL240, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Pentax and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the XG-1 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XG-1 was unveiled 4 years after the TL240 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the XG-1 matches up vs the TL240 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax XG-1 and Samsung TL240. The full galleries are available at Pentax XG-1 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung TL240
XG-1 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 56 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Pentax XG-1
TL240 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung TL240
XG-1 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Pentax XG-1 has got outer dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the XG-1 compared to the TL240.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XG-1 and TL240 is 66 and 95 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by seeing technical specs. The image here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XG-1 and TL240.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Pentax XG-1 to show extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent XG-1 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Pentax XG-1 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax XG-1 | Samsung TL240 |
Also Known as | - | ST5000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-07-15 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LB-060 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $599 | $171 |