Pentax XG-1 vs Sigma DP2s
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Pentax XG-1 vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Launched July 2014
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Previous Model is Sigma DP2
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2x
Pentax XG-1 vs Sigma DP2s Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Pentax XG-1 and Sigma DP2s, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Pentax and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the XG-1 (1/2.3") and DP2s (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XG-1 was brought out 4 years after the DP2s which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2s being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XG-1 grades against the DP2s when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax XG-1 vs Sigma DP2s Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax XG-1 & Sigma DP2s. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Sigma DP2s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Sigma DP2s
XG-1 | DP2s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2014 | February 2010 | Newer by 54 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Pentax XG-1
DP2s | XG-1 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Sigma DP2s
XG-1 | DP2s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax XG-1 comes with exterior measurements of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2s has proportions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
See the Pentax XG-1 and Sigma DP2s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the XG-1 compared to the DP2s.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XG-1 and DP2s is 66 and 86 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The pic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XG-1 and DP2s.
All in all, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XG-1 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Pentax XG-1 will give greater detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger XG-1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax XG-1 vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax XG-1 vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
Pentax XG-1 | Sigma DP2s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Sigma |
Model type | Pentax XG-1 | Sigma DP2s |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-07-15 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 280 gr (0.62 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LB-060 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $940 |