Pentax XG-1 vs Sony RX10 IV
Portability
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Portability
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
Pentax XG-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced September 2017
- Superseded the Sony RX10 III
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax XG-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Pentax XG-1 versus Sony RX10 IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Pentax and Sony. The resolution of the XG-1 (16MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is fairly similar but the XG-1 (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe XG-1 was released 4 years prior to the RX10 IV and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XG-1 matches up against the RX10 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax XG-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax XG-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Sony RX10 IV
| XG-1 | RX10 IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Pentax XG-1
| RX10 IV | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2017 |  | July 2014 | Fresher by 38 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1440k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+980k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Sony RX10 IV
| XG-1 | RX10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Pentax XG-1 enjoys physical dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Sony RX10 IV has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Examine the Pentax XG-1 versus Sony RX10 IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XG-1 and the RX10 IV.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XG-1 and RX10 IV is 66 and 52 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XG-1 and RX10 IV.
Clearly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XG-1 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony RX10 IV will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older XG-1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax XG-1 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
focusing manually
flash sync speed is above average (1/2,000s)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax XG-1 Street photography information
Sony RX10 IV Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition (567g)
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW files
features focus via touch
weather sealing
heavier than others (1,095 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax XG-1 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Sports photography camera
excellent zoom range (24-1248mm 52.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery life (240 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (24.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
supports phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Pentax XG-1 Travel photography highlights
Sony RX10 IV Travel photography highlights
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1248mm)
missing Timelapse recording
low battery life (240 shots)
more heavy than competition (567 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
weather sealing
supports bluetooth
features focus via touch
decent MP (20MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (1,095 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Pentax XG-1
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 IV
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low battery life (240 per charge)
missing Timelapse recording
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW files
weather sealing
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Pentax XG-1
Vlogging with Sony RX10 IV
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (567 grams)
really wide (24mm)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
comes with external mic jack
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
heavier than others (1,095 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
| Model | Pentax XG-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-07-15 | 2017-09-12 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.4-4.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,440k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per sec | 24.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567g (1.25 pounds) | 1095g (2.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 400 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LB-060 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $599 | $1,698 |