Pentax XG-1 vs Sony S2000
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Released July 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax XG-1 vs Sony S2000 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Pentax XG-1 and Sony S2000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Pentax and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XG-1 was brought out 4 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the XG-1 grades against the S2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax XG-1 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax XG-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Sony S2000
| XG-1 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Pentax XG-1
| S2000 | XG-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Sony S2000
| XG-1 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax XG-1 features physical measurements of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Pentax XG-1 and Sony S2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the XG-1 and the S2000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XG-1 and S2000 is 66 and 93 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XG-1 and S2000.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Pentax XG-1 to render extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The newer XG-1 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax XG-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-07-15 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LB-060 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $599 | $225 |