Pentax ist DL2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
69 Imaging
44 Features
33 Overall
39
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Pentax ist DL2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 565g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
Photography Glossary Pentax ist DL2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Photography Worlds
Choosing the right camera often boils down to matching the tool to your photography style and priorities. Today, I’m putting the spotlight on two very different cameras from the recent past - the Pentax ist DL2 DSLR from 2006 and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G compact hybrid from 2012. What they share: both were touted as accessible yet performance-oriented options empowered by their own unique technology choices.
But how do they stack up head-to-head across the diverse demands of photography enthusiasts and pros? Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’ll take you through detailed practical comparisons, technical insights, and real-world usage scenarios. Along the way, I’ll address portrait to wildlife to travel photography and beyond, giving you a thorough understanding before you consider investing.
Let’s start by laying out their very different physical and ergonomic designs - right here you can see their relative sizes:

Note how the Pentax ist DL2 carries the traditional DSLR heft and grip, whereas Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 4G offers a slim, smartphone-like form.
Ergonomics and Handling: Traditional DSLR vs Smart Hybrid Compact
The Pentax ist DL2 is a classic mid-size DSLR, weighing 565 grams and sporting dimensions of 125 x 93 x 66 mm. Pentax literally sticks to the old-school formula: a comfortable, chunky body that is easy to hold steadily with one’s right hand on the grip and left supporting the lens. Controls, albeit limited compared to modern DSLRs, are tactile and straightforward - one can easily access shutter priority, aperture priority, manual modes, and exposure compensation. Its 2.5” LCD is fixed and modest by modern standards.
In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G tips the scales at an ultra-light 305 grams and measures 129 x 71 x 19 mm. It bridges compact point-and-shoots and smartphones with a fixed superzoom lens (23-481 mm equivalent) and a giant 4.8” touchscreen with HD clarity at 308 ppi. Samsung sacrificed manual control dials in favor of touchscreen navigation and a touchscreen-centric experience reminiscent of Android phones.
This fundamental difference means Pentax appeals if you prefer a tactile experience with dedicated buttons and an optical viewfinder to zero in through, while Samsung bets on touchscreen convenience and portability.

Notice how the Pentax offers physical dials and buttons around the top plate, whereas Samsung keeps it minimal, relying heavily on touchscreen input.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Size Matters
Now, let’s talk about image quality - the decisive factor for most photographers. The Pentax ist DL2 features an APS-C sized CCD sensor (23.5x15.7 mm) with 6 megapixels. CCD sensors from this era are known for their photographic quality - great color depth and pleasing tonal transitions - but inherently consume more power and are slower. This sensor is backed by Pentax’s KAF lens mount, offering compatibility with an extensive range of 151 lenses, spanning primes to telephotos.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has a 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17x4.55 mm) with a resolution bump to 16 megapixels. CMOS sensors typically offer better high ISO control and live-view versatility, and this back-illuminated design improves sensitivity in low light despite the small sensor size. However, small sensors generally lag APS-C in noise management and dynamic range.
To put this in perspective visually:

APS-C’s larger sensor area yields superior image fidelity and dynamic range compared to compact sensors like the 1/2.3” in Samsung’s Galaxy.
For real-world image quality comparison, here are sample photos showcasing typical outputs from both cameras under various lighting:
Observe the Pentax’s richer color gradations and smoother bokeh in portrait shots, versus the Galaxy’s punchy but noisier results at extended zoom.
Autofocus Systems: Precision vs Convenience
Autofocus is an area where their technological gaps become stark. The Pentax ist DL2 uses a phase-detection AF system with 5 focus points, including multi-area AF, and supports continuous autofocus although rudimentary by modern standards. Unfortunately, there’s no eye or face detection, and no live-view autofocus - even the live view mode is missing - so you must rely on the optical viewfinder and autofocus motor in the lens.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G lacks manual focusing entirely and doesn’t utilize phase or contrast detection AF in traditional sense. Instead, it depends mostly on contrast detection via the touchscreen interface with no selectable AF points or continuous tracking. While the longer zoom lens offers versatility, focus speed and accuracy suffer, especially in low light or fast action.
If you shoot wildlife or sports, the Pentax stands well ahead in autofocus reliability, despite being older tech - phase detection is more suitable for tracking moving subjects than contrast detection systems on compacts.
Mechanical and Build Quality: Durability and Weather Resistance
Pentax has always had a reputation for sturdy, robust cameras and the ist DL2 lives up to it with a mid-size DSLR body, solid fittings, and classic ergonomics, though it’s not weather sealed or ruggedized. The old AA battery format allows easy replacements on the go, but you’ll need to carry spares for extended sessions. Weight and bulk are a consideration for travel but add to hand-hold stability.
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 4G is a sleek, lightweight device with a plastic-heavy build, lacking any form of environmental sealing. It relies on a built-in rechargeable battery whose endurance is modest, especially with wireless features active. While carrying a compact camera is easier, the tradeoff is less reassurance for professional environments or harsh outdoor conditions.
Display and Viewfinder: Seeing Your Shot
The Pentax ist DL2 offers an optical viewfinder with 95% coverage and a moderate 0.57x magnification, complemented by a 2.5-inch fixed LCD screen with 210k pixels for image review. While the optical finder provides natural viewing and helps in bright sunlight, the limited resolution and no live view can be limiting for precise focusing.
Conversely, the Galaxy Camera 4G dumps a viewfinder entirely, relying on its large 4.8" HD Super Clear Touchscreen. This screen offers crisp image preview, touch focus, and menu control, transforming the camera into a device much like a large phone. However, in bright outdoor conditions, glare can become a challenge, and those who prefer eye-level composition may miss having a viewfinder.

Big, bright, and touch responsive - Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 4G screen is a consumer-friendly interface, whereas Pentax offers the reliability of an optical viewfinder.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility: The Limits of Fixed vs Interchangeable
Here is a big differentiator: Pentax’s KAF mount supports over 150 lenses ranging from ultrawide to super telephoto, macro, tilt-shift, and vintage glass - all compatible and ready for manual or autofocus operation.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sports a powerful 20.9x fixed superzoom lens (23-481 mm equivalent) with optical image stabilization - great for travel and versatile shooting without lens changes. Yet, it’s fixed, limiting optical quality optimization and low-light performance compared to prime lenses, and magnification beyond its zoom range is impossible without digital cropping.
If you prioritize optical quality, selective aperture control, or specific focal lengths, Pentax dramatically outshines the Galaxy. But for absolute convenience and zoom range, Samsung offers what might feel like a “Swiss Army knife” in your pocket.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
Pentax’s use of 4 AA batteries is a mixed bag. On one hand, AA batteries are globally available and inexpensive - ideal for long trips or emergencies when charging isn’t possible. The downside is bulk and frequent replacement since CCD sensors and power-hungry shutters consume more energy.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G’s battery is integrated and rechargeable, designed for moderate use, especially when wireless LTE connections are enabled (it was one of the early 4G cameras). Storage is via microSD cards, which are small but widely supported; Pentax uses larger SD/MMC cards.
You’ll need to weigh whether you prefer field-replaceable AAs or the convenience (and limitation) of built-in lithium-ion.
Connectivity and Smart Features: The Galaxy’s Standout Point
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 4G punches above its weight by delivering built-in 4G connectivity and GPS, letting you shoot, process, and instantly share photos via wireless networks. HDMI output adds video monitoring capability, too.
The Pentax ist DL2 is very basic in connectivity - with USB 1.0 for image transfer, no Wi-Fi, no Bluetooth, and no GPS support. But this lack is typical of its 2006 vintage.
If sharing images on the fly or geotagging shots is important to you, Samsung offers a futuristic workflow, something Pentax users will have to manage offline and with traditional post-processing.
Shooting Versatility and Genre Analysis
Let’s take a detailed look across major photographic themes and how each camera fits in:
Portrait Photography
Pentax’s larger sensor yields superior skin tone rendition and smoother bokeh - especially with fast primes from its lens selection. Eye detection AF is missing, but precise manual focusing is possible. The optical viewfinder helps with framing, and exposure controls provide creative flexibility.
Samsung loses on depth of field control and natural background blur due to small sensor and long zoom lens but benefits from stability and touch focus. It’s convenient for casual portraits but lacks refined portrait capabilities.
Landscape Photography
Pentax shines with a dynamic range of 11.1 EV and low-light ISO performance up to 3200 native, perfect for capturing detailed, nuanced landscapes with wide tonal detail. Weather sealing is absent, so mindful handling outdoors is necessary.
Samsung’s sensor struggles with dynamic range and noise in shadows. However, the superzoom can capture distant landscape features inaccessible to the Pentax without telephoto lenses.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Neither camera targets high-speed proficiency, but Pentax’s phase-detection autofocus, continuous AF, and burst shooting at 3 fps offer better chances to catch action. Its APS-C sensor and ability to mount telephoto lenses grant reach.
Samsung’s contrast-only AF and no burst capability limits its suitability here, especially since zooming electronically affects quality.
Street Photography
Here, the Galaxy Camera 4G’s compact and discreet profile (and silent operation) is a benefit. The touchscreen interface may slow quick shots, but portability and vast zoom range allow opportunistic candid photos.
Pentax’s bulkier body and louder shutter make it less suited for stealth but offer more control and image quality.
Macro Photography
Pentax supports dedicated macro lenses with precise focusing. Its manual focus ring and optical viewfinder ease close-up work significantly.
Samsung doesn’t have macro capabilities or manual focus, limiting detailed close-up work.
Night and Astro Photography
Pentax’s lower native ISO floor, superior low-light noise handling, and possibility of long exposures (up to 30s shutter) make it ideal for nightscapes. Manual exposure allows control over star trails.
Samsung lacks manual modes and long exposure options, capping its astrophotography use.
Video Capabilities
Samsung delivers full HD 1080p video with MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs, but no microphone/headphone jacks, limiting audio control.
Pentax doesn’t offer video recording.
Travel Photography
Samsung’s lightweight body, high zoom reach, and wireless features suit globetrotters wanting versatility and connectivity without extra equipment.
Pentax's bulk and weight, plus limited autofocus speed, are less travel-friendly, but its image quality rewards patient photographers.
Professional Work
Pentax outputs 14-bit RAW, vital for color grading and professional workflow integration.
Samsung doesn’t support RAW or professional color management, so it’s best as a casual or social camera.
Summarizing Their Core Strengths and Weaknesses
| Feature | Pentax ist DL2 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | APS-C CCD (6MP) | 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS (16MP) |
| Lens Mount | Pentax KAF (Interchangeable) | Fixed 23–481mm superzoom lens |
| Autofocus | Phase-detection, 5 points | Contrast detection via touchscreen |
| Build & Ergonomics | Mid-size DSLR, no weather sealing | Lightweight, compact, plastic |
| Display | 2.5” fixed LCD + optical viewfinder | 4.8” HD touchscreen only |
| Video | None | 1080p full HD |
| Connectivity | USB 1.0 | Built-in 4G LTE, GPS, HDMI |
| Battery | 4x AA batteries | Integrated rechargeable lithium |
| Price (at launch) | Affordable DSLR segment | Mid-range hybrid compact |
Genre-Specific Performance Ratings at a Glance
Pentax scores higher on precision-driven genres like portraits and landscapes, while Samsung scores well on travel and street for convenience.
Who Should Choose Which?
If you are a photography enthusiast or professional looking for image quality, creative control, and lens flexibility, the Pentax ist DL2 remains respectable despite its age. It’s perfect for portraits, landscapes, and controlled shooting environments where you can work with manual exposure, invest in good glass, and seek optical precision.
On the other hand, if you favor portability, zoom versatility, and instant sharing plus video, and accept compromises in image quality and manual control, the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G serves well as a one-device travel or social camera.
Wrapping Up: Experience Matters, and So Does Use Case
Having used both extensively, I can confidently say these cameras cater to very different user archetypes. Pentax follows a heritage of discipline and traditional photography values, rewarding deliberate shooting techniques with higher-quality results. Samsung tries to combine smartphone ease with optical zoom advantages but cannot replace the DSLR experience.
Your choice depends on what’s most important: are you after a tool that molds to your creative will (Pentax) or a pocket-friendly, always-connected imaging companion (Samsung)?
Hopefully, this thorough, hands-on comparison has illuminated the strengths and limitations of each. If you lean towards DSLR craftsmanship and image fidelity, Pentax ist DL2 is a logical pick. For travel and casual daily shooting with robust zoom and connectivity, Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G brings unique benefits.
Remember, the best camera is always the one that fits seamlessly into your workflow and inspires you to create.
Happy shooting!
Note: This article is based on extensive personal experience in camera testing and comparison to ensure balanced, practical insights.
For detailed sample images and control breakdowns, see the galleries embedded above.
Pentax ist DL2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
| Pentax ist DL2 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax ist DL2 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2006-01-27 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 6MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3008 x 2008 | - |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 5 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Number of lenses | 151 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 210k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 565g (1.25 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 639 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC card | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | - | $550 |