Pentax ist DL2 vs Sony H70
69 Imaging
44 Features
33 Overall
39


93 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35
Pentax ist DL2 vs Sony H70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 565g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced January 2006
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011

Pentax ist DL2 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70: A Thorough Hands-On Comparison Across Photography Genres
When budgets and shooting needs shape camera choices, diving into the specs can feel like deciphering a foreign language mixed with marketing jargon. I’ve logged thousands of hours testing cameras in studios, wild landscapes, sporting arenas, and dimly lit backstreets - so I get the struggle. Today, we pit the Pentax ist DL2, a 2006 mid-sized DSLR with a respectable APS-C sensor, against the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70, a 2011-era compact zoom with a small 1/2.3” sensor and a noteworthy 10x optical zoom. While they inhabit different classes, their overlapping price points and use cases make this an intriguing cross-category faceoff.
Here, I’ll unpack everything from sensor tech and ergonomics to autofocus and real-world image quality - sprinkled with my own experience testing and field-shooting with both. We’ll traverse multiple photography disciplines, break down key specs, assess value, and help you pick the better fit. No snake oil - just practical insight.
Getting Our Hands Dirty: Build, Size, and Ergonomics
If you’ve held a DSLR like the Pentax ist DL2, you know the reassuring heft and grip - a middle ground between compact portability and professional bulk. The ist DL2 weighs in at 565 grams and measures 125 x 93 x 66 mm, powered by four AA batteries - a practical choice if you find yourself off-grid.
In contrast, the Sony H70 reflects classic compact camera minimalism: sleek, pocketable, and weighing a mere 194 grams at 102 x 58 x 29 mm. It uses a proprietary NP-BG1 lithium-ion battery optimized for travel lightness.
The difference in handling is stark. The Pentax’s DSLR form factor offers physical dials and a solid grip conducive to longer shooting sessions and manual control - essential for enthusiasts who like to “feel” the camera. The Sony’s compact form suits snapshot-style shooting and travel but limits manual adjustment comfort.
The top control layout on the ist DL2 feels familiar and tactile, featuring dedicated dials for exposure modes and shooting parameters. The Sony opts for a more stripped-down experience with fewer physical buttons, relying heavily on menus for lens zoom, exposure, and settings.
Ergonomics in DSLRs like the Pentax favor deliberate shooting; for street photographers craving quick reflexes and discretion, the Sony’s lightweight minimalism wins. But for studio, landscape, or macro photographers who explore settings meticulously, the pentaprism hump and physical dials of the ist DL2 better invite creativity.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Let’s talk image-making muscle. At the core, the Pentax ist DL2 houses a 6-megapixel APS-C CCD sensor (approx. 23.5 x 15.7 mm), a size that dead-solidly outclasses the Sony H70’s much smaller 1/2.3” CCD at 6.17 x 4.55 mm - roughly 28 mm² sensor area versus the Pentax’s 369 mm².
It's not just about megapixel counts; larger sensors gather more light, provide improved dynamic range, and reduce noise at higher ISOs. Speaking of, the ist DL2's sensor offers a native ISO range of 200 to 3200, delivering respectable low-light capabilities for a camera its age, with DxOMark scores around 65 overall, 22.9 bits color depth, and an 11.1 EV dynamic range. The Sony’s sensor, despite higher nominal resolution at 16 MP, suffers from the physical constraints of its sensor size, limiting dynamic range and low-light performance - numbers not officially tested but known to underperform compared to APS-C.
In practice: shoot a sunset or shadowy interior, the Pentax’s sensor retains detail and color nuances far better than the Sony. Landscape photographers and portrait enthusiasts will appreciate the superior tonal gradations and reduced noise.
Looking Back: Display and Interface Experience
Neither camera sports cutting-edge touchscreens or high-res articulations - common for their eras - but their rear displays tell a story.
The Pentax ist DL2’s fixed 2.5-inch LCD offers 210k dots resolution, adequate for reviewing focus and exposure but limited for critical evaluation on-the-go. The Sony H70, by contrast, sports a slightly larger 3-inch Clear Photo LCD with 230k dots - brighter and arguably easier to view under variable lighting conditions.
Live view is a big missing feature on the Pentax, meaning the optical viewfinder is your only preview method; it covers about 95% of the frame, which is typical but not pixel-perfect. The Sony, being a compact, lacks a viewfinder altogether, relying on the LCD-only interface.
For photographers used to modern, live view-enabled cameras, the Pentax’s absence of that feature might feel restricting - but experienced DSLR shooters often prefer the clarity and immediacy of an optical viewfinder.
Autofocus Systems: Hunting for Sharpness
Focus accuracy can make or break a shot - especially for wildlife or sports. The Pentax ist DL2 employs a phase-detection autofocus system with five focus points and multi-area AF modes. Its continuous autofocus offers decent tracking for its class but lacks face and eye detection, animal eye AF, or advanced predictive algorithms we see today.
In my testing, the DL2’s AF is reliable in daylight, a little sluggish and prone to focus hunting in low-contrast or low light scenarios. Its focus confirmation via viewfinder helps, but manual tweaking is sometimes necessary.
The Sony H70 uses contrast-detection autofocus, with 9 points and multi-area selection - no face detection nor continuous AF. Its single AF mode and 1 fps continuous shooting limit its speed but work well for static subjects and general shooting.
If you’re chasing wildlife or action shots, neither camera dazzles by today’s standards. However, the Pentax’s phase-detection AF is a notable step up over the Sony’s basic system, better suiting sports or dynamic wildlife but not quite matching modern beasts.
Lens Ecosystem: The Flexibility Factor
If lenses are king, then Pentax ist DL2 carries a modest kingdom of about 151 compatible K-mount lenses - ranging from fast primes and versatile zooms to specialized macro optics.
This expansive lens ecosystem means users can tailor the system to portraiture, landscapes, or wildlife with appropriate glass, benefiting from the APS-C sensor’s 1.5x crop factor that extends telephoto reach.
Sony’s H70 is a fixed lens “all-in-one” zoom camera, offering a 25-250 mm equivalent range with f/3.5-5.5 aperture - quite versatile for travel and casual shooting without lens swap hassle.
Practically speaking, the Sony’s lens can do close macro shots at approximately 5cm focusing distance, while the Pentax requires dedicated macro glass. The Pentax’s lack of image stabilization in body means stabilization depends on lenses or shooting technique, whereas the Sony has optical image stabilization built-in - useful for handheld zoom shots.
Burst Rates and Shutter Speeds: Catching the Action
Sports aficionados will note the Pentax ist DL2 can shoot at 3 frames per second - a respectable speed for an advanced DSLR in 2006. With shutter speed ranging from 30 seconds up to 1/4000th, it covers slow shutter bulb exposures for night or astro, and fast speeds for freezing action.
The Sony H70’s max shutter speed is only 1/1600th, with a more leisurely 1 fps continuous shooting limit - meaning you won't capture split-second sports moments effectively.
The Pentax is the clear winner here, making it a more viable choice for action or dynamic wildlife photography - provided the AF keeps up.
Video and Connectivity: A Look Back and Forward
Video capabilities are minimal on both. The ist DL2 has no video recording function, reflecting its DSLR focus on stills. The Sony H70 supports 720p HD video at 30 fps (MPEG-4), limited but useful for casual clips.
Connectivity-wise, both cameras fall short by today’s standards. The Pentax offers only USB 1.0, whereas the Sony benefits from USB 2.0 speed and HDMI output for playback on HDTVs. Neither supports Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, although the Sony has Eye-Fi card compatibility, allowing limited wireless photo transfers via compatible SD cards.
Battery Life and Storage
Here, the Pentax ist DL2’s use of four AA batteries offers versatile power options - alkaline, NiMH rechargeables, or even lithium - great for travels or emergencies when proprietary batteries aren’t available.
The Sony H70 uses the NP-BG1 lithium-ion battery, more compact but with finite lifespan; you’d want spares for extended trips.
Both use single card slots supporting SD variants. The Sony additionally supports Memory Stick formats - quaint but common for Sony’s ecosystem at the time.
Real-World Shooting Across Genres
Now to my favorite part - how do these translate into actual photography across disciplines?
Portrait Photography
The Pentax’s larger sensor delivers softer, more natural skin tones and superior bokeh thanks to wider apertures available in K-mount lenses. However, lack of face and eye detection autofocus demands manual precision for critical sharpness.
The Sony offers higher resolution images but smaller sensor and f/3.5-5.5 lens limit background separation and dynamic range for portraiture. Its limited AF modes can hinder sharp eye focus - important for compelling portraits.
Landscape Photography
Here, the Pentax shines. The APS-C sensor captures broader tonal range and renders details crisply at 6 MP - enough for moderate prints and web use. The Sony’s small sensor can't compete in dynamic range or shadow retention, and the active sensor stabilization helps handheld shots but can’t boost native image quality.
The Pentax’s weather sealing is absent, but many K-mount lenses include sealing, whereas the Sony lacks any environmental protections.
Wildlife and Sports
Pentax’s faster shutter, phase-detect AF, and burst shooting make it a more practical option for timid wildlife or amateur sports. The Sony’s slower AF and limited burst expose you to missed moments.
Street and Travel
Sony’s compact size and zoom lens win for street photographers wanting discreet, lightweight gear. However, the fixed, modest aperture hurt performance in low light.
Pentax is bulkier and louder, which might draw attention in candid shooting - but rewards with superior image quality and manual control.
Weight and battery versatility favor the Pentax for travel as well, though Sony’s smaller footprint benefits casual shooters.
Macro and Night Photography
Pentax users can pick from a wide range of macro lenses; the absence of image stabilization is a minus but manageable on tripod or with fast lenses. The Sony’s macro mode with 5cm minimum focusing is convenient for casual close-ups but can’t rival dedicated glass.
For night or astrophotography, the Pentax’s 30-second shutter, ISO 3200, and APS-C sensor offer real potential. The Sony’s maximum shutter of 1/1600 and limited ISO flexibility make it less suitable.
Summing Up: The Verdict in Numbers and Impressions
For those craving data, here’s an overall performance snapshot synthesized from hands-on tests and DxOMark:
And when we break down by photography genres, the Pentax holds notable edges in image quality, burst rate, and control, while Sony leads on portability and zoom versatility.
Who Should Buy the Pentax ist DL2?
- Enthusiasts desiring the tactile DSLR experience with manual exposure modes
- Portrait and landscape photographers valuing image quality and dynamic range
- Amateur wildlife and sports shooters needing reasonable burst and phase-detect AF
- Those with a budget to explore diverse lenses and accessories
- Shooters comfortable without live view or video, ready to work within early DSLR limits
While dated, the Pentax offers a solid entry into DSLR shooting with extensive lens compatibility and respectable image quality - a camera for those who want to learn photography fundamentals while owning a capable body.
Who Should Consider the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70?
- Casual shooters seeking an all-in-one compact solution with a long zoom range
- Travelers and street photographers wanting light gear with easy point-and-shoot usability
- Budget buyers prioritizing convenience over advanced control or image quality nuances
- Users wanting basic HD video and simple macro modes in a pocketable camera
The Sony is a pragmatic choice for snapshot photographers and beginners who want zoom versatility without the learning curve of interchangeable lenses or manual modes.
Final Thoughts from the Field
Choosing between the Pentax ist DL2 and Sony H70 feels like picking between a trusty pocket knife and a Swiss Army tool - similar goal, distinct design philosophy.
The Pentax invites hands-on learning, deeper control, and higher-quality stills but demands patience with its lacking modern conveniences like live view, silent shutter, or wireless connectivity. The Sony charms with simplicity, zoom reach, and video ability but can’t outpace the Pentax’s raw image quality or advanced shooting features.
From my years spent pushing cameras to their limits, I’ve learned that no tool is perfect, but one tailored to your workflow and vision will serve you best.
If you’re after serious growth as a photographer, the ist DL2 is a steadfast companion; if you want no-nonsense versatility with instant gratification, the H70 fits the bill.
To wrap up, consider what inspires you most: Is it crafting perfect portraits, chasing fleeting sports moments, exploring landscapes, or simply capturing daily memories? Your answer will guide you to the camera better suited to your photographic journey. Hopefully, this hands-on, no-fluff comparison brings clarity to that choice. Happy shooting!
Pentax ist DL2 vs Sony H70 Specifications
Pentax ist DL2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax ist DL2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-01-27 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 5 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 210k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | No | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 565g (1.25 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 639 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | - | $199 |