Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and GR (16MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX1 was launched 5 years prior to the GR and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the CX1 matches up vs the GR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 & Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Ricoh GR
CX1 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Ricoh CX1
GR | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2013 | February 2009 | More recent by 50 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Crisper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh GR
CX1 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh CX1 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the CX1 and the GR.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and GR is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and GR.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX1 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh GR will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older CX1 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh GR |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-02-19 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 300 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 180 gr (0.40 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $299 | $971 |