Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc791/dc791c379c416f050f2a7563d8e9c10fefab17d4" alt="Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Ricoh CX1 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The CX1 was revealed 7 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the CX1 grades versus the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are available at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
CX1 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Ricoh CX1
WG-5 GPS | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 72 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
CX1 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX1 has exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX1 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the CX1 vs the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09d45/09d456fd9072255516b494d5ef1ad29daa59521b" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and WG-5 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3e88/e3e88873891c7774894a0a8875f04f2134ee6442" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to deliver greater detail because of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfcff/cfcffb0592cd3fc90acbc2f4e1a76685ff00afc6" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96cd9/96cd9467d84ae72ca1739e8c1e05e30bbac91e66" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-02-19 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180 gr (0.40 lb) | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $299 | $500 |