Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-50
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-50, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX1 was unveiled 9 years prior to the WG-50 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the CX1 matches up versus the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX1 & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Ricoh WG-50
| CX1 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Ricoh CX1
| WG-50 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 100 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-50
| CX1 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX1 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX1 and Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the CX1 against the WG-50.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and WG-50 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and WG-50.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to produce greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older CX1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh CX1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-02-19 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 180 gr (0.40 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-70 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $299 | $280 |
