Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Also Known as WB5500
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and HZ50W (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe CX1 was revealed 14 months earlier than the HZ50W which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the CX1 matches up vs the HZ50W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX1 & Samsung HZ50W. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung HZ50W
CX1 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh CX1
HZ50W | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2010 | February 2009 | Fresher by 14 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung HZ50W
CX1 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX1 features outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ50W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the CX1 versus the HZ50W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and HZ50W is 93 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX1 and HZ50W.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung HZ50W to offer you extra detail because of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung HZ50W |
Alternative name | - | WB5500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-02-19 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 180g (0.40 pounds) | 426g (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $299 | $250 |