Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
66 Imaging
67 Features
90 Overall
76
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 550g - 139 x 102 x 66mm
- Revealed September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and NX1 (28MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and NX1 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX1 was introduced 6 years before the NX1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the CX1 grades vs the NX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX1. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung NX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung NX1
| CX1 | NX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1 over the Ricoh CX1
| NX1 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 67 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1036k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX1
| CX1 | NX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh CX1 offers outside dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung NX1 has specifications of 139mm x 102mm x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the CX1 vs the NX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and NX1 is 93 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The visual here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and NX1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The CX1 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX1 will render more detail using its extra 19 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older CX1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Samsung NX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung NX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2009-02-19 | 2014-09-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | DRIMe 5 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 28 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 6480 x 4320 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 209 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 153 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,036 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 15.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 11.00 m (ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.265 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 180g (0.40 pounds) | 550g (1.21 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 139 x 102 x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 83 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1363 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-70 | BP1900 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $299 | $1,500 |