Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Samsung NX200 front
Portability
90
Imaging
61
Features
57
Overall
59

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
  • Introduced February 2012
  • Earlier Model is Samsung NX100
  • Replacement is Samsung NX210
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung NX200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The CX1 was introduced 4 years earlier than the NX200 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the CX1 scores versus the NX200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung NX200

 CX1 NX200 
Display resolution920k614kClearer display (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh CX1

 NX200 CX1 
IntroducedFebruary 2012February 2009More recent by 36 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX200

 CX1 NX200 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX1 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung NX200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the CX1 and the NX200.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and NX200 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The visual below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and NX200.

Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX1 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX200 will resolve more detail using its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung NX200 as a Portrait photography camera
25
you can focus manually
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
low megapixels (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
76
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focus
exports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Street photography highlights
Samsung NX200 Street photography highlights
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
73
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (223g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Sports photography info
Samsung NX200 Sports photography info
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
55
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung NX200 as a Travel photography camera
59
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
68
lighter than competition in class (223g)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung NX200 Landscape photography highlights
42
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
70
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen is a good size (3")
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Vlogging advice
Samsung NX200 Vlogging advice
28
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
34
features face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (223 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX200
 Ricoh CX1Samsung NX200
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX1 Samsung NX200
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-02-19 2012-02-28
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3456 x 2592 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 15
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 28-200mm (7.1x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.2 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 32
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 180 grams (0.40 lbs) 223 grams (0.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 69
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 618
Other
Battery life - 330 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID DB-70 BC1030
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $299 $818