Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX100
- Replacement is Samsung NX210
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung NX200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX1 was introduced 4 years earlier than the NX200 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the CX1 scores versus the NX200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX200. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung NX200
CX1 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh CX1
NX200 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | February 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX200
CX1 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX1 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung NX200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the CX1 and the NX200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and NX200 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The visual below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and NX200.
Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX1 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX200 will resolve more detail using its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-02-19 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) | 223 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $299 | $818 |