Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX2000
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Announced November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX1100
- New Model is Samsung NX3000
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX2000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX1 was brought out 5 years earlier than the NX2000 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the CX1 grades versus the NX2000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX2000. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung NX2000
CX1 | NX2000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Ricoh CX1
NX2000 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | February 2009 | Fresher by 58 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 920k | Clearer screen (+232k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX2000
CX1 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 has exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has sizing of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung NX2000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the CX1 vs the NX2000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and NX2000 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and NX2000.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The CX1 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX2000 will give extra detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-02-19 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.7" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 180 gr (0.40 lbs) | 228 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $299 | $599 |