Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL620
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL65
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and SL620 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX1 was unveiled within a month of the SL620 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the CX1 grades versus the SL620 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 & Samsung SL620. The full galleries are available at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung SL620
| CX1 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh CX1
| SL620 | CX1 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung SL620
| CX1 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX1 features external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the CX1 and the SL620.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and SL620 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The picture below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and SL620.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung SL620 to deliver greater detail having an extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL65 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-02-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $299 | $200 |