Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc791/dc791c379c416f050f2a7563d8e9c10fefab17d4" alt="Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cea25/cea2556b1a07c2d959f12ad972aaebab16e8ce4b" alt="Samsung SL720 front Samsung SL720 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is PL70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung SL720, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and SL720 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The CX1 was manufactured 4 months before the SL720 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the CX1 matches up against the SL720 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung SL720. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung SL720
CX1 | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Ricoh CX1
SL720 | CX1 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung SL720
CX1 | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2009 | ![]() | July 2009 | Similar generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung SL720 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung SL720 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the CX1 and the SL720.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0655c/0655cc415a01078f277c203db9edf4d687d8d5f9" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 size comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and SL720 is 93 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38af4/38af46f0dd8c9fe1f0b94b86e241c9fb36b3f0c5" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and SL720.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung SL720 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2e96/d2e964df3ddffc1c3cb94f1eaeafb8227fa6fb74" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bbbf/6bbbf252c295aca8e7a321782109bf17b53a815f" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung SL720 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung SL720 |
Also referred to as | - | PL70 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-02-19 | 2009-07-14 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $299 | $119 |