Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and ST150F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX1 was unveiled 4 years prior to the ST150F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the CX1 scores vs the ST150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung ST150F. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung ST150F
| CX1 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Ricoh CX1
| ST150F | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 47 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung ST150F
| CX1 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX1 offers exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the CX1 versus the ST150F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and ST150F is 93 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and ST150F.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung ST150F to produce extra detail having an extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung ST150F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-02-19 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) | 114 grams (0.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $299 | $300 |
