Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The CX1 was released 23 months prior to the ST95 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the CX1 scores vs the ST95 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung ST95

 CX1 ST95 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh CX1

 ST95 CX1 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011February 2009Fresher by 23 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung ST95

 CX1 ST95 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 comes with outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the CX1 against the ST95.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and ST95 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX1 and ST95.

All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung ST95 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX1
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
25
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
30
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Street photography highlights
Samsung ST95 Street photography highlights
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
50
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
max ISO too low (0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Sports photography information
Samsung ST95 Sports photography information
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
MP count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
27
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Travel photography camera
59
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
MP count low (9MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
71
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
good max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX1
Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
42
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
MP count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
38
good max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3")
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Vlogging information
Samsung ST95 Vlogging information
28
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
27
good max aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung ST95
 Ricoh CX1Samsung ST95
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX1 Samsung ST95
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-02-19 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Max resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 80 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-200mm (7.1x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.2 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 180 gr (0.40 pounds) -
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $299 $145