Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe CX1 was revealed 3 years prior to the WB210 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the CX1 matches up against the WB210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX1 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB210
| CX1 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+919k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh CX1
| WB210 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 29 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB210
| CX1 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 offers exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the CX1 against the WB210.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and WB210 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The picture here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and WB210.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB210 to give you extra detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged CX1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-02-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 180 grams (0.40 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $279 |
