Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Announced February 2009
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The CX1 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WB30F which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the CX1 matches up against the WB30F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB30F

 CX1 WB30F 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh CX1

 WB30F CX1 
IntroducedJanuary 2013February 2009More modern by 47 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB30F

 CX1 WB30F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh CX1 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB30F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the CX1 versus the WB30F.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and WB30F is 93 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Often, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and WB30F.

Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB30F to give more detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged CX1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography highlights
25
you can focus manually
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
35
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Street photography factors
Samsung WB30F Street photography factors
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
64
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (128g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Sports photography camera
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
45
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Travel photography camera
59
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than others (128 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography factors
42
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
43
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh CX1
Vlogging with Samsung WB30F
28
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone support
33
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
lighter than others (128 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB30F
 Ricoh CX1Samsung WB30F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX1 Samsung WB30F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-02-19 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-200mm (7.1x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.3-5.2 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 180 grams (0.40 lb) 128 grams (0.28 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $299 $180