Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Announced February 2009
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB350F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The CX1 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WB350F which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the CX1 matches up against the WB350F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB350F

 CX1 WB350F 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh CX1

 WB350F CX1 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014February 2009Newer by 59 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB350F

 CX1 WB350F 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX1 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the CX1 and the WB350F.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and WB350F is 93 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and WB350F.

Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB350F to give more detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Portrait photography camera
25
has manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
40
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Street photography camera
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh CX1
Sports photography with Samsung WB350F
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
50
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
59
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
great zoom (483mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography info
42
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
50
has manual focus
reasonably wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB350F as a Vlogging camera
28
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone socket
34
reasonably wide (23mm)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic port
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh CX1Samsung WB350F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX1 Samsung WB350F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-02-19 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Maximum resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-200mm (7.1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.3-5.2 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 180 gr (0.40 pounds) 276 gr (0.61 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-70 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $299 $260