Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc791/dc791c379c416f050f2a7563d8e9c10fefab17d4" alt="Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The CX1 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WB35F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the CX1 matches up versus the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB35F
CX1 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh CX1
WB35F | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 59 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB35F
CX1 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX1 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the CX1 compared to the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f90f/2f90fc371b5f7dfb60d62d0af78d896c0d4a8d7a" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61a88/61a88d3d616983dd25d472e6505b35cbc8a6c79e" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and WB35F.
All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to result in greater detail having an extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older CX1 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5e8f/b5e8fda70c7ede9214c4682c51f24cd0968343c6" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1c92/e1c92f603eefa8c5909cb3a4acf774c7cedd766b" alt="Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB35F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-02-19 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $299 | $130 |