Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB700 (14MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX1 was released 22 months prior to the WB700 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the CX1 grades vs the WB700 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX1 & Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB700
| CX1 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh CX1
| WB700 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 22 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB700
| CX1 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX1 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the CX1 versus the WB700.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and WB700 is 93 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and WB700.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB700 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-02-19 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 180 gr (0.40 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $300 |