Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The CX1 was brought out 4 years earlier than the WB800F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the CX1 matches up versus the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB800F

 CX1 WB800F 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh CX1

 WB800F CX1 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2009Fresher by 47 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB800F

 CX1 WB800F 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the CX1 vs the WB800F.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The visual here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and WB800F.

Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to give more detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
25
manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low MP (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
44
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Street photography highlights
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (218g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Sports photography highlights
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
53
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh CX1
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
59
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
low MP (9 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than average in class (218 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography features
42
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual exposure
low MP (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
50
has manual focus
really wide (23mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Vlogging features
Samsung WB800F Vlogging features
28
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
35
really wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (218 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh CX1Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX1 Samsung WB800F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-02-19 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Full resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-200mm (7.1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.3-5.2 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 180 gr (0.40 lbs) 218 gr (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $299 $300