Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Released January 2012
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB850F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB850F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe CX1 was unveiled 3 years before the WB850F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the CX1 scores versus the WB850F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB850F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB850F
CX1 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Crisper display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh CX1
WB850F | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 35 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB850F
CX1 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB850F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the CX1 vs the WB850F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and WB850F is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and WB850F.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB850F to give you more detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung WB850F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-02-19 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180 gr (0.40 lb) | 250 gr (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $299 | $599 |