Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Samsung WB850F front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Launched February 2009
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
  • Released January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Overview

Here is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB850F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and WB850F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The CX1 was unveiled 3 years before the WB850F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the CX1 scores versus the WB850F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung WB850F

 CX1 WB850F 
Display resolution920k614kCrisper display (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh CX1

 WB850F CX1 
ReleasedJanuary 2012February 2009Fresher by 35 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB850F

 CX1 WB850F 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung WB850F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the CX1 vs the WB850F.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and WB850F is 93 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and WB850F.

To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB850F to give you more detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX1
Portrait photography with Samsung WB850F
25
has manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
43
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Street photography details
Samsung WB850F Street photography details
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (250g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh CX1
Sports photography with Samsung WB850F
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
52
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Travel photography details
Samsung WB850F Travel photography details
59
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
low resolution sensor (9MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than average in class (250g)
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB850F Landscape photography highlights
42
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
49
you can focus manually
pretty wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB850F as a Vlogging camera
28
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic support
34
pretty wide (23mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (250g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung WB850F
 Ricoh CX1Samsung WB850F
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX1 Samsung WB850F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-02-19 2012-01-09
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-200mm (7.1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.3-5.2 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - AMOLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 180 gr (0.40 lb) 250 gr (0.55 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $299 $599