Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-3N
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Replacement is Sony a5000
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Ricoh CX1 and Sony NEX-3N, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe CX1 was revealed 5 years before the NEX-3N which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the CX1 matches up versus the NEX-3N in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Sony NEX-3N
CX1 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh CX1
NEX-3N | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | February 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Sony NEX-3N
CX1 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh CX1 provides external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX1 and Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the CX1 versus the NEX-3N.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and NEX-3N is 93 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and NEX-3N.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CX1 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-3N will offer you extra detail because of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged CX1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-02-19 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $299 | $399 |