Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-C3
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-F3
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Ricoh CX1 versus Sony NEX-C3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX1 was launched 3 years prior to the NEX-C3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the CX1 matches up vs the NEX-C3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX1 & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Sony NEX-C3
CX1 | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh CX1
NEX-C3 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | February 2009 | More modern by 30 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Sony NEX-C3
CX1 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has sizing of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 versus Sony NEX-C3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the CX1 compared to the NEX-C3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and NEX-C3 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to see the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and NEX-C3.
As you can see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The CX1 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony NEX-C3 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-02-19 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $299 | $343 |