Ricoh CX1 vs Sony QX1
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Announced September 2014
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Ricoh CX1 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Ricoh CX1 and Sony QX1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the CX1 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX1 was revealed 6 years earlier than the QX1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the CX1 grades vs the QX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX1 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX1 & Sony Alpha QX1. The full galleries are available at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Sony QX1
| CX1 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh CX1
| QX1 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 | February 2009 | Fresher by 67 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Sony QX1
| CX1 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX1 has physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX1 and Sony QX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the CX1 against the QX1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and QX1 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and QX1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The CX1 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony QX1 will render greater detail because of its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older CX1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2009-02-19 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 180g (0.40 pounds) | 216g (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-70 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $500 |