Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Ricoh. The image resolution of the CX2 (9MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very well matched but the CX2 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") use different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX2 was launched within a month of the GR Digital III so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the CX2 matches up versus the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX2 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
CX2 | GR Digital III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Ricoh CX2
GR Digital III | CX2 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR Digital III
CX2 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2009 | July 2009 | Similar age | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 features outside measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the CX2 compared to the GR Digital III.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and GR Digital III is 93 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The pic here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and GR Digital III.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CX2 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR Digital III will give you more detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-08-20 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $341 | $399 |