Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released August 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Let's look more closely at the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Ricoh. The resolution of the CX2 (9MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very close but the CX2 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The CX2 was manufactured 3 years before the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the CX2 grades against the GR Digital IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 CX2 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Ricoh CX2

 GR Digital IV CX2 
LaunchedSeptember 2011August 2009More recent by 25 months
Display resolution1230k920kClearer display (+310k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 CX2 GR Digital IV 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the CX2 versus the GR Digital IV.

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and GR Digital IV is 93 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and GR Digital IV.

As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX2 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Ricoh GR Digital IV will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older CX2 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography info
25
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
41
you can focus manually
delivers RAW files
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX2
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (185 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh CX2
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery life (390 per charge)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than competitors (185 grams)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (9MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
67
great battery life (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
42
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
53
you can focus manually
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (390 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging info
30
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (185 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic port
29
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not offer selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Ricoh CX2Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Ricoh Ricoh
Model Ricoh CX2 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-08-20 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3456 x 2592 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m (ISO 400) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 185g (0.41 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model DB-70 DB65
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $341 $599