Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR III
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Later Model is Ricoh GR III
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact and they are both created by Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and GR III (24MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX2 was manufactured 10 years prior to the GR III and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the CX2 matches up versus the GR III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh GR III
CX2 | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Ricoh CX2
GR III | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | August 2009 | Fresher by 110 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR III
CX2 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 features physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh GR III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the CX2 compared to the GR III.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and GR III is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The graphic below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and GR III.
All in all, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The CX2 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will give you extra detail due to its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older CX2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh GR III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-08-20 | 2018-09-25 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185g (0.41 lb) | 257g (0.57 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $341 | $900 |