Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

The following is a in-depth overview of the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both are built by Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The CX2 was launched 5 years before the WG-4 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the CX2 matches up against the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh WG-4

 CX2 WG-4 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Ricoh CX2

 WG-4 CX2 
LaunchedFebruary 2014August 2009Newer by 54 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-4

 CX2 WG-4 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the CX2 against the WG-4.

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The pic here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and WG-4.

As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography highlights
25
manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
41
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX2
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (185 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh CX2
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than competition (185g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
low MP (9MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
72
environment sealing
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 per charge)
does not have selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
42
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
54
manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
bad battery life (240 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Vlogging camera
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (185 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic jack
36
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of mic port
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-4
 Ricoh CX2Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Brand Ricoh Ricoh
Model type Ricoh CX2 Ricoh WG-4
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Launched 2009-08-20 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185 grams (0.41 lbs) 230 grams (0.51 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID DB-70 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $341 $330