Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX2 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the CX2 grades versus the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CX2 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh CX2
| WG-4 GPS | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CX2 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 has outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the CX2 compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give you greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-08-20 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-70 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $341 | $210 |