Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX2 was brought out 9 years earlier than the WG-6 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the CX2 scores against the WG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 & Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh WG-6
| CX2 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Ricoh CX2
| WG-6 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 103 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-6
| CX2 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 provides physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX2 and the WG-6.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and WG-6 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and WG-6.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-6 to resolve extra detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-08-20 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lbs) | 246g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $341 | $271 |