Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX2 was brought out 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the CX2 scores versus the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| CX2 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh CX2
| WG-M1 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-M1
| CX2 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX2 provides outside dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX2 vs the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and WG-M1 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and WG-M1.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-70 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $341 | $2,000 |
