Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Samsung CL5 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
14
Overall
24

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Samsung CL5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
  • 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Alternate Name is PL10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 Overview

Below is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the CX2 (9MP) and the CL5 (9MP) is relatively well matched but the CX2 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The CX2 was announced 6 months later than the CL5 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the CX2 matches up versus the CL5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung CL5

 CX2 CL5 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh CX2

 CL5 CX2 

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung CL5

 CX2 CL5 
ReleasedAugust 2009February 2009Similar age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 has got physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the CX2 compared to the CL5.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and CL5 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and CL5.

All in all, both of those cameras have the same resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The CX2 comes with the bigger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field easier.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography info
Samsung CL5 Portrait photography info
25
you can focus manually
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
24
offers face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX2
Street photography with Samsung CL5
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (185 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Sports photography features
Samsung CL5 Sports photography features
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung CL5 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than others (185g)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
51
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low MP (9MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung CL5 as a Landscape photography camera
42
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
22
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging advice
Samsung CL5 Vlogging advice
30
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (185g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
25
offers face detection autofocus
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic port
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung CL5
 Ricoh CX2Samsung CL5
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX2 Samsung CL5
Alternative name - PL10
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-08-20 2009-02-23
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3456 x 2592 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.5-4.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185 gr (0.41 pounds) 141 gr (0.31 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $341 $391