Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Launched January 2006
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX2 was brought out 3 years after the GX-1S which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the CX2 matches up vs the GX-1S with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung GX-1S
CX2 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2009 | January 2006 | More modern by 44 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 210k | Sharper display (+710k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh CX2
GX-1S | CX2 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung GX-1S
CX2 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the CX2 versus the GX-1S.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and GX-1S is 93 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The picture below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and GX-1S.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The CX2 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh CX2 will give you more detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The younger CX2 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung GX-1S |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-08-20 | 2006-01-16 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $341 | $850 |