Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Released January 2008
- Superseded the Samsung GX-10
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and GX-20 (15MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and GX-20 (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX2 was unveiled 20 months later than the GX-20 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the CX2 matches up vs the GX-20 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung GX-20. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung GX-20
CX2 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2009 | January 2008 | More recent by 20 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Ricoh CX2
GX-20 | CX2 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung GX-20
CX2 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung GX-20 has dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the CX2 compared to the GX-20.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and GX-20 is 93 and 58 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The graphic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and GX-20.
All in all, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The CX2 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung GX-20 will offer you more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern CX2 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Samsung GX-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung GX-20 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2009-08-20 | 2008-01-24 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4688 x 3120 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lb) | 800 grams (1.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 714 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $341 | $850 |