Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX2 was manufactured 4 years prior to the NX300M which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the CX2 grades versus the NX300M in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung NX300M. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung NX300M
CX2 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 768k | Sharper display (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Ricoh CX2
NX300M | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | August 2009 | More modern by 41 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung NX300M
CX2 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 has external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung NX300M has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the CX2 and the NX300M.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and NX300M is 93 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and NX300M.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX2 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung NX300M will provide you with more detail due to its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged CX2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung NX300M |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 768k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lb) | 331 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $341 | $699 |