Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL820
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is IT100
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung SL820, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and SL820 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe CX2 was brought out 7 months after the SL820 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the CX2 matches up versus the SL820 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung SL820. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung SL820
| CX2 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh CX2
| SL820 | CX2 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung SL820
| CX2 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 features outside dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung SL820 has specifications of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung SL820 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the CX2 and the SL820.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and SL820 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and SL820.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung SL820 to offer extra detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger CX2 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung SL820 |
| Alternative name | - | IT100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-20 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 4.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-70 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $341 | $280 |