Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and ST95 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The CX2 was introduced 17 months before the ST95 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the CX2 grades against the ST95 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung ST95

 CX2 ST95 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh CX2

 ST95 CX2 
LaunchedJanuary 2011August 2009More recent by 17 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung ST95

 CX2 ST95 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 features outside measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the CX2 and the ST95.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and ST95 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and ST95.

As you have seen, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung ST95 to provide extra detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The older CX2 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography features
Samsung ST95 Portrait photography features
25
has manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
30
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Street photography details
Samsung ST95 Street photography details
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (185g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
50
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low maximum ISO (0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Sports photography features
Samsung ST95 Sports photography features
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
decent MP (16MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Travel photography advice
Samsung ST95 Travel photography advice
66
lighter than others in class (185g)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
71
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Landscape photography camera
42
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
MP count low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
38
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging details
Samsung ST95 Vlogging details
30
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (185g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic port
27
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung ST95
 Ricoh CX2Samsung ST95
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX2 Samsung ST95
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-08-20 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 80 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) ()
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m (ISO 400) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 185 gr (0.41 lb) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $341 $145