Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL100
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
91 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released January 2009
- Also referred to as ST50
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung TL100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and TL100 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX2 was manufactured 8 months after the TL100 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the CX2 grades versus the TL100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung TL100. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung TL100
| CX2 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 8 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Ricoh CX2
| TL100 | CX2 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL100
| CX2 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung TL100 has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung TL100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the CX2 and the TL100.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and TL100 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image below may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and TL100.
As you can see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung TL100 to give extra detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent CX2 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung TL100 |
| Other name | - | ST50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-08-20 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) | 219 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $341 | $22 |
