Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
35
Features
36
Overall
35

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Also referred to as WB1000
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The CX2 was unveiled 6 months after the TL320 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the CX2 matches up against the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung TL320

 CX2 TL320 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh CX2

 TL320 CX2 

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL320

 CX2 TL320 
AnnouncedAugust 2009February 2009Same age
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX2 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the CX2 against the TL320.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and TL320 is 93 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and TL320.

Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung TL320 to show greater detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography information
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography information
25
focusing manually
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
34
focusing manually
comes with face detection focus
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Street photography factors
Samsung TL320 Street photography factors
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (185g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Sports photography advice
Samsung TL320 Sports photography advice
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
30
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Travel photography factors
Samsung TL320 Travel photography factors
66
lighter than average in class (185g)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
sensor resolution low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
59
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography details
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography details
42
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
43
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh CX2
Vlogging with Samsung TL320
30
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (185 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic port
31
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh CX2Samsung TL320
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX2 Samsung TL320
Also referred to as - WB1000
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-08-20 2009-02-23
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3456 x 2592 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185 grams (0.41 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $341 $380