Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL500
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Additionally referred to as EX1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the CX2 (9MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is fairly similar but the CX2 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX2 was brought out 10 months earlier than the TL500 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the CX2 scores vs the TL500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung TL500. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung TL500
| CX2 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Ricoh CX2
| TL500 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL500
| CX2 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the CX2 and the TL500.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and TL500 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading technical specs. The picture here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and TL500.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The CX2 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung TL500 will deliver greater detail having its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung TL500 |
| Also called as | - | EX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-08-20 | 2010-07-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lb) | 386g (0.85 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-70 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $341 | $527 |