Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB2200F
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe CX2 was released 5 years prior to the WB2200F which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the CX2 scores vs the WB2200F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung WB2200F
| CX2 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh CX2
| WB2200F | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB2200F
| CX2 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB2200F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the CX2 versus the WB2200F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and WB2200F is 93 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and WB2200F.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to give greater detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-08-20 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 1/8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lbs) | 708g (1.56 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-70 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $341 | $599 |